Some Socialized Health Care Structure Will take World Influence not to mention Impressive Registries.
In a nationalized health care system, you need to find out who is who – otherwise the machine could never be able determine who is entitled. The structure depends on how the machine is created and designed, but with a nationalized health care system you will soon be tracked by the state where you reside and the method that you relocate a manner that’s unseen in America. The nationalized health care system becomes a vehicle for population control.
In the event that you leave the United States and are no further a resident of the state, even though you are a citizen and might maintain a driving license, you will have to report immediately if you intend to prevent the 13% health care tax. I use the number 13% as it is in Sweden to exemplify the actual tax pressure that’s laid upon you for the nationalized health care.
Let’s say you moved and you may not want to pay the 13% tax for services you may not receive, can receive, or wish to taken out from the tax roll. The mammoth entity has no interest to let you go so easy. You find yourself having to reveal your private life – partner, dwellings, travel, money, and job to prove your case that you have the best to leave the public health care system and do not want to pay the tax. When you have to seek an appeal, your information could be a part of administrative court documents which can be open and public documents. When you go back to the United States, you will soon be automatically enrolled again and the taxes start to pile up.
Public universal health care has no fascination with protecting your privacy. They desire their tax money and, to fight for your rights, you will have to prove that you meet the requirements not to be taxable. For the reason that process, your private life is up for display.
The national ID-card and national population registry which includes your medical information is a foundation of the nationalized health care system. You will see where that is going – population control and capability to use the law and health care use of map all of your private life in public searchable databases owned and operated by the government.
By operating an impeccable population registry that tracks where your home is, who your home is with, when you move and your citizen status including residency the Swedes can separate who can receive universal health care from those not entitled. The Swedish authorities will know if you have a Swedish social security number, with the tap of the keyboard, more info about yourself than you are able to remember. The Swedish government has taken sharing of information between agencies to a fresh level. The reason is very simple – to get health care tax and suppress any tax evasion.
It’s heavily centralized and only the central administration can alter the registered information in the data. So if you intend to change your name, even the slightest change, you have to file an application at a national agency that processes your paperwork. This centralized population registry makes it possible to find out who is who under all circumstances and it’s required for the national health care system. Otherwise, any person could claim to be entitled.
To implement that in the United States requires a new doctrine for population registry and control. In a American context that would require that every existing driving license must be voided and reapplied under stricter identification rules that would match not just data from Internal Revenue Service, state government, municipal government, Social Security Administration, and Department of Homeland Security but almost any agency that delivers services to the general public. The key reason why a fresh population registry could be needed in the United States is the truth that lax rules dating back again to the 1940s up before War on Terrorism, and stricter identification criteria following 9/11, has made an important percentage of personal details about individuals questionable.
If America instead neglects maintaining secure records, determining eligibility for public health care would not be possible and the floodgates for fraud would open and rampant misuse of the machine would prevail. This may eventually bring down the system.
It’s financially impossible to make a universal health care system without clearly knowing who is entitled and not. The system will need limits of its entitlement. A social security number would not be sufficient as these numbers have been passed out through decades to temporary residents which may not live in the United States or might today be out of status as illegal immigrants.
The Congress has investigated the price of lots of the “public options”, but nevertheless we’ve no clear picture of the actual realm of the group that could be entitled and under which conditions. The danger is political. It’s very easy for political reasons to extend the entitlement. Politicians might have trouble being firm on illegal immigrants’ entitlement, as that would put the politicians on a collision course with mainly the Hispanic community as they represent an important area of the illegal immigrants. So the easy sell is then that everyone that’s a legal resident alien or citizen can join according to at least one fee plan and then a illegal immigrants can join according to a different fee structure. That assumes that they actually pay the fee which is really a wild guess because they are likely to be able to get access to service without having to state that they are illegal immigrants.
It would work politically – but again – with no impeccable population registry and control over who is who on a national level, that is unlikely to succeed. The system could be predestined to fail due to lack of funds. In the event that you design something to provide the health care needs for a population and then increase that population without any extra funds – then naturally it’d cause less degree of service, declined quality, and waiting lists for complex procedures. In real terms, American health care goes from being fully a first world system to a next world system.
Thousands, if not really a million, American residents live as some other American citizen but they’re still not in good standing with their immigration even when they’ve been here for ten or fifteen years. A widespread health care system will raise issues about who is entitled and who is not.
The alternative is for an American universal health care system to surrender to the truth that there is no order in the people registry and just provide health care for everyone who shows up. If that is completed, costs will dramatically increase at some level depending on who will pick up the bill – the state government, the federal government, or the public health care system.
Illegal immigrants that have arrived within the past years and constitute an important population would create an enormous pressure on a universal health care, if implemented, in states like Texas and California. If they’re given universal health care, it would be a pure loss for the machine as they mostly benefit cash. treatment and management of asthma They’ll never be payees to the universal health care system as it is based on salary taxes, and they do not file taxes.
The difference is that Sweden has almost no illegal immigrants compared to the United States. The Swedes do not provide health care services for illegal immigrants and the illegal immigrants could be arrested and deported if they might need public service without good legal standing.
This firm and uniform standpoint towards illegal immigration is important in order to avoid a universal health care system from crumbling down and to maintain a sustainable ratio between those that pay into the machine and those that benefit from it.
The working middle class that would be the backbone to pay into the machine would not only face that their existing health care is halved in its service value – but most likely face higher cost of health care as they could be the ones to pick up the bill.
The universal health care system might have maybe 60 million to 70 million “free riders” if based on wage taxes, and maybe half if based on fees, that’ll not pay anything to the system. We know that approximately 60 million Americans pay no taxes as adults add to that the estimated 10-15 million illegal immigrants.
There’s no way a universal health care system could be viably implemented unless America creates a population registry that can identify the entitlements for every person and that would have to be designed from scratch to a top degree as we can’t rely on driver’s license data as the quality could be too low – a lot of errors.
Many illegal immigrants have both social security numbers and driver’s licenses as they were issued without rigorous control of status before 9/11. The alternative is you had to show a US passport or even a valid foreign passport with a natural card to be able to register.
Another problematic task is the number of points of registration. If the registration is completed by hospitals – and not really a federal agency – then it’s highly likely that registration fraud could be rampant. It could be very easy to trespass the control of eligibility if it’s registered and determined by way of a hospital clerk. This supports that the eligibility must be determined by a central administration that’s a vast use of data and details about our lives, income, and medical history. If a single registration at a healthcare provider or hospital would guarantee you free health care for a lifetime and there is no rigorous and audited process – then it’s a given that corruption, bribery, and fraud could be synonymous with the system.
This calls for an important degree of political strength to confront and set the limits for who is entitled – and here comes the true problem – selling out health care to have the votes of the free riders. It’s apparent that the political power of the “free” health care promise is extremely high.
An offer that can not alienate anyone as a tighter population registry would upset the Hispanic population, as lots of the illegal immigrants are Hispanics – and many Hispanics may be citizens by birth but their elderly parents are not. Would the voting power of younger Hispanics act to place pressure to extend health care to elderly which are not citizens? Yes, naturally, as every group tries to maximise its own self-interest.
The danger is, even by having an enhanced population registry, that the group of entitled would expand and put additional burden on the machine beyond what it was designed for. That might come though political wheeling and dealing, sheer inability from an administrative standpoint to recognize groups, or systematic fraud within the machine itself.